Few things are more imporant to me. In fact I have five rules defiining those things that are important to me. Loving family, loving friends, helping others, and always dressing nicely are four of those concepts or ideals I hold dear but Afghanistan fits in with the fifth ideal, that being, “to live everyday in the defense of my country and my people.” Some do it better then others. Soldiers hold true to my fifth ideal much better then I myself do. Should a different path have been written for myself I might have joined them. But to each his own destiny, inscribed before he is born, and remembered after he is dead.
Inevitably when I write posts like this and cross-link it to my Facebook wall, I loose a few ‘friends,’ which I find just plain odd. I sometimes want to write the most outrageous things just to see what would result. But this post is far from outrageous.
Currently, tens of thousands of American men, and women, haul 50 to 80 pounds or more across ditches and corn fields, through valleys, across deserts, and up steep mountains three to five thousand feet higher then the hills that roll across southern California. These Americans criss-cross a nation literally half-way around the world, a place that has been the nexus of the black market since the dawn of trade itself. From the first hints at civilization, the nation of Afghanistan has provided a constant stream of evil among whatever good the eye could behold. From invasions to warlords, or invasions that brought with them warlords. Never once ruled as a western state, nor an Arab state - but always as the sole outlier of nations among nations. The topology of the place does not lend itself to any sort of connection among it’s people. The people who live there are themselves a gradient. Starting in the South and heading North one will experience a sort of evolution from Indian-Persian to Persia-East Asian.
But why are we there? Today, more than eight years after our Forces first stepped foot in the country, why are we still there? It is often lost on a populace such a thing as the history of war. Forget the art of war, to be mastered by soldier and general, the simple history should be understood by the citizenry of - at the very least - the supposed greatest nation on Earth, America. And no where in the history of war is it written that a war must be fought in the shortest possible time frame. In less then eight years more Americans have died fighting in Iraq then in our whole time being in Afghanistan - surely a measure of time and casualties are not two data points that can be readily related. Not to shed a dim light on a true Hero’s death, but more have died from AIDs in the last 8 years, in America alone, then in either war combined. Perhaps if the same amount of resources and money that has gone into America’s Great Early 21st Century Adventure had gone into HIV/AIDs research, we would have one less problem on our hands. Today, a growing chorus of Americans who don’t wage war on behalf of their country believe our Force presence in Afghanistan should be limited or withdrawn altogether. A view shared by Vice President Joe Biden. That eight years is enough and it is time to come home, to solve other problems, to spend money elsewhere. No matter what I may believe would have been a better use of our dollar and blood, this aforementioned notion Americans are dreaming up, about our future in Afghanistan, is an ill conceived notion at best and dangerous at worst. To have come so far, and done so little is a testament to the average Americans way of life, but it should not be the sole guiding factor by which we leave Afghanistan.
The people grow tired and ignorant of a war that our fellow American’s are waging across Afghanistan. But they should not. While American’s are traditionally known for having shorter than average attention spans, and bigger than average attitudes, they should not forget what the history of war has taught us. And American’s should not forget the friends we were to the Europeans when we helped them with their problems, twice, or the big hearts our allies still believe us to have.
When we went to wage war in Afghanistan we did not do so in order to defeat a salient enemy. In fact, it was all well understood that the enemy Americans would face in Afghanistan were nothing more advanced then cave dwellers with guns. With regard to that however, in reviewing all prior contests with cave dwellers and their guns, one will find that very few exist after the “Middle Ages.” More importantly wars then were fought in the time-frame of decades. They picked up even where generations before had left them, only to continue for generations later. Such long and enduring wars were commonplace, ‘back in the day,’ and should not be counted as any less common today. Americans should not loose resolve for the war that we wage simply because it’s boring.
To answer the question of why we are there today, one must ask, why is war even important? People often wonder what the meaning of our current war in Afghanistan is. I would plainly state that the goal of any war is to stop the enemy from killing you. If the enemy still decides to shoot you, then you have not won. It is as simple as that. There are no metrics, or bar graphs, or funky jargon to go along with it. We won World War II simply because the Germans decided to collectively stop shooting at us. It was, after millions had died, as simple as that, a decision, like any other among the hundreds of thousands of decisions we make every day.
After reviewing the facts, the missions, and ideals, as I’ve done above. What should we do? It is most certainly not a simple thing to ask my fellow countrymen to continue to fight a war, on our behalf, to save the people of Afghanistan, to destroy an enemy of America, and to establish a new foothold for our great charter that is democracy. But it is what we must do. And we must do it intelligently.
There is no greater service to that which one commands, then the truth. The truth is not something that General McChrystal, no matter how highly regarded he stands in military circles, is entirely committed to. Neither is General Petraus so much a General, as he is a Professor of War. I do not believe it the case that either is well equipped to command our Forces in Afghanistan. The War in Afghanistan requires an individual with ruthless wit who is able to micro-manage on a country-wide scale. The terrain in Afghanistan creates pockets around the country, each a microcosm - each unique. Where one thing might work in one area, it will most certainly not work in another. And a General must understand this and be able to adapt of the gradient that is Afghanistan. He must also act as philosopher. To thing logically and rationally about the ethical and moral dilemmas that surround not only how his troops interact with the local populace but also how his troops might fare in a certain location among an angry or tepid populace. Certainly the recent eight deaths and Nuristan and before, the nine deaths in Wanat Valley, were not due to errors on the ground but simply the result of the greatest of FUBARs from HQ.
How do we win, then? As I stated before. The question better asked is, “how do we get them to stop shooting at us?”
Kill them.
Win them over.
Pay them to stop.
Anybody who thinks it’s more complicated then that, needs to take a step back, review the situation then quit. Because we don’t need you.