In what has become a never ending story for me, I now finish.  Though as it is, I like investigating, it’s a hobby.

The Omega Figure

The omega figure on the pictured side of the UFO seems to obscure the true detail of the surface(s).  This may be it’s ultimate goal, or a nice side effect of some other origin.  Whatever the case may be, it is not coincidental.

There is not much more one could write about this, having studied aircraft for the last three years I have never seen a “signature” of sorts on the underside of an aircraft.  It is most likely coincidence and an amalgam of various surfaces interacting together in the way they do, and on the other end it is purposefully hiding something.  There are similarities between this UFO’s omega marking and other UFO’s spotted across the globe, but that doesn’t lend credence to this UFO’s existence, rather it inserts skepticsm and mystery to the realitve existence of this craft.

The omega feature is by far the most mysterious and striking feature of this UFO (it can be seen in any one of the number of figures posted herein).

Conclusions

When I first approached this case, I didn’t start with some conclusion that it was something I’d seen before.  It very clearly was not something I had seen before.  I also knew that in the end I would not be able to determine what this plane was, what it’s designation was, or where it came from.  One simply and obviously could not do that with the information provided.

Which begs the question, is it real to begin with?  The goal of this four part exposition was to analyze what one can observe.  You can make your own conclusion as to whether it is real or not.  My own answer is, there is not enough information to determine anything extensively about this UFO, including whether the photo in and of itself is real or not. We can simply point out the crafts definite characteristics.

This case has been taken up by the famed Steve Douglass, and while I find his article brash and a sample of poor investigating it may be worth the read.  There are some conclusions he makes which an investigator should never make.  The boiling point for me was when he conducts his image analysis.  He showed us an example how what a similar fake photo would look like, but I would like to see the same image analysis done to the created photo and compare that to the UFO photo, this baseline testing is simple stuff… really.  If his greatest achievment was debunking this photo as a fake, then he must think it’s pretty easy, because only and idiot of unmatched caliber would think that photo is real.  I would love to go through every point he tries to make and posit a counter point, but I’ve already done 4 parts to this saga and it’s time to end.